Challenges and Drivers of Industrialist Propensity Among Chemical Engineering Students in STEM Institution in Zimbabwe: Towards A Conceptual Framework
Abstract
NUST in Zimbabwe grapples with a significant challenge. Despite enrolling many students in chemical engineering, the nation lacks operational industries. Consequently, graduates often encounter difficulties securing employment or attachment placements post-graduation. This underscores the critical need to foster student entrepreneurship, encouraging innovation and idea generation. The study employed a mixed-methods research design to address this issue, combining qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The quantitative aspect utilized a quasi-experimental pre-test and post-test design, while the qualitative component involved conducting focus group interviews with chemical engineering students in the experimental group. The findings from both approaches complemented each other, providing a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing entrepreneurial propensity among NUST chemical engineering students. Data collection involved distributing research instruments and questionnaires to NUST students and individuals associated with the mining and pharmaceutical industries. The collected data were then entered into an Excel spreadsheet, allowing for the recording of respondents' numbers alongside their respective responses. The study applied descriptive statistics to evaluate responses and their alignment with research objectives, revealing barriers to entrepreneurial inclination among NUST chemical engineering students, such as limited resources, risk aversion, inadequate entrepreneurial education, and cultural norms. Students benefited from personal motivation, a supportive educational atmosphere, networking opportunities, and exposure to innovative ideas. These factors nurtured self-determination, social networking, and an entrepreneurial mindset. To foster entrepreneurial spirit among NUST chemical engineering students, the study suggests educational reforms, mentorship programs, and potential policy changes create an enabling environment, empowering students to pursue entrepreneurship and contribute to economic growth.
References
A. A. Barakabitze et al., “Transforming African Education Systems in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Using ICTs: Challenges and Opportunities,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2019, pp. 1–29, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/6946809.
H. Chitate, “Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM): A Case Study of Zimbabwe’s Educational Approach to Industrialisation,” World J. Educ., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 27–35, 2016, doi: 10.5430/wje.v6n5p27.
T. Saiden, “Towards An Entrepreneurship And Stem Education Primary School Curriculum In Zimbabwe: A Case Study Of Bumburwi Of Gweru District,” Adv. Soc. Sci. Res. J., vol. 4, no. 18, pp. 148–159, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.418.3723.
S. Saiden &, “Towards an Entrepreneurship Curriculum in a Developing Country Tertiary Institution: The Case of Zimbabwe Open University,” Soc. J. Vol 2 (2018 )Issn 2581-6624, vol. 3, no. 2003, pp. 82–105, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://purkh.com/index.php/tosocial.
C. Baden-Fuller and S. Haefliger, “Business Models and Technological Innovation,” Long Range Plann., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 419–426, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.023.
F. W. Taylor, “The Rise of Scientific Management,” Quantified Work. Law Technol. Mod. Work., vol. 9, 2023.
S. A. Shane, A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003.
C. M. Van Praag and P. H. Versloot, “What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research,” Small Bus. Econ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 351–382, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11187-007-9074-x.
J. A. Schumpeter and R. V. Clemence, Essays: On entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles and the evolution of capitalism. Routledge, 2017.
M. V. Jones and N. E. Coviello, “Internationalisation: Conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behaviour in time,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 284–303, 2005, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400138.
I. Bull and G. E. Willard, “Towards a theory of entrepreneurship,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 183–195, 1993.
S. Shane and S. Venkataraman, “The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research,” Entrep. Concepts, Theory Perspect., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 171–184, 2007, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8_8.
C. Fernandes, J. J. Ferreira, P. M. Veiga, S. Kraus, and M. Dabić, “Digital entrepreneurship platforms: Mapping the field and looking towards a holistic approach,” Technol. Soc., vol. 70, p. 101979, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101979.
E. S. C. Berger, F. von Briel, P. Davidsson, and A. Kuckertz, “Digital or not – The future of entrepreneurship and innovation: Introduction to the special issue,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 125. Elsevier, pp. 436–442, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.020.
L. K. Gundry and H. P. Welsch, “The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 453–470, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00059-2.
R. D. Hisrich and M. Soltanifar, “Unleashing the Creativity of Entrepreneurs with Digital Technologies,” Digit. Entrep. Impact Bus. Soc., pp. 23–49, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-53914-6_2.
H. J. Witt, J. R. Alabart, F. Giralt, J. Herrero, L. Vernis, and M. Medir, “A competency-based educational model in a chemical engineering school,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 218–235, 2006.
M. A. Delgado and M. C. Fonseca-Mora, “The use of co-operative work and rubrics to develop competences,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. e33–e39, 2010.
M. Th. et al., “The importance/role of education in chemical engineering,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 187, pp. 164–173, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.08.061.
R. G. McGrath and I. C. MacMillan, “More like each other than anyone else? A cross-cultural study of entrepreneurial perceptions,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 419–429, 1992.
H. S. Brown, M. de Jong, and T. Lessidrenska, “The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: A case of institutional entrepreneurship,” Env. Polit., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 182–200, 2009, doi: 10.1080/09644010802682551.
D. J. Brown, G. M. Campbell, D. J. Belton, P. W. Cox, P. Garcia-Trinanes, and C. Tizaoui, “New chemical engineering provision: Quality in diversity,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 28, pp. 30–44, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2019.02.002.
R. M. Bakker and J. S. McMullen, “Inclusive entrepreneurship: A call for a shared theoretical conversation about unconventional entrepreneurs,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 38, no. 1, p. 106268, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106268.
P. Muñoz and J. Kimmitt, “Entrepreneurship and the rest: The missing debate,” J. Bus. Ventur. Insights, vol. 9, pp. 100–106, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.03.003.
R. J. Pidduck and D. R. Clark, “Transitional entrepreneurship: Elevating research into marginalized entrepreneurs,” J. Small Bus. Manag., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1081–1096, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00472778.2021.1928149.
A. R. Anderson and R. Smith, “The moral space in entrepreneurship: An exploration of ethical imperatives and the moral legitimacy of being enterprising,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 479–497, 2007, doi: 10.1080/08985620701672377.
P. Jones, C. Miller, A. Jones, G. Packham, D. Pickernell, and P. Zbierowski, “Attitudes and motivations of Polish students towards entrepreneurial activity,” Educ. Train., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 416–432, 2011, doi: 10.1108/00400911111147721.
Y. Stamboulis and A. Barlas, “Entrepreneurship education impact on student attitudes,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 365–373, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2014.07.001.
B. Gupta, D. Mookherjee, K. Munshi, and M. Sanclemente, “Community origins of industrial entrepreneurship in colonial India,” J. Dev. Econ., vol. 159, p. 102973, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102973.
R. Brown and A. Rocha, “Entrepreneurial uncertainty during the Covid-19 crisis: Mapping the temporal dynamics of entrepreneurial finance,” J. Bus. Ventur. Insights, vol. 14, p. e00174, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00174.
Y. K. Lee, C. Sue-Chan, and T. Y. Hui, “Getting more than grades out of supplemental instructions: Examining the effect of coaching styles on undergraduate students’ entrepreneurial intentions and creativity,” in Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2016, 2017, pp. 190–193, doi: 10.1109/TALE.2016.7851793.
D. R. Clark, G. C. Crawford, and R. J. Pidduck, “Exceptionality in entrepreneurship: Systematically investigating outlier outcomes,” J. Bus. Ventur. Insights, vol. 20, p. e00422, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00422.
P. . Szycher, New Venture Creation. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2020.
K. M. Y. Law and K. Breznik, “Impacts of innovativeness and attitude on entrepreneurial intention: among engineering and non-engineering students,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 683–700, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10798-016-9373-0.
W. M. I. Udayanganie, M. Jusoh, and K. Chinna, “Impact of Big Five Personality Traits on Entrepreneurial Intention of Engineering Undergraduates,” Res. Bus. Manag., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 35, 2019, doi: 10.5296/rbm.v6i2.15147.
M. C. Padma and V. Sridhar, “Mini-Project Based Approach to Promote Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ. Transform., vol. 29, no. 3, p. 67, 2016, doi: 10.16920/jeet/2016/v29i3/85226.
F. O. Soares, M. J. Sepúlveda, S. Monteiro, R. M. Lima, and J. Dinis-Carvalho, “An integrated project of entrepreneurship and innovation in engineering education,” Mechatronics, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 987–996, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2012.08.005.
A. K. Bhattarai and P. K. Karki, “Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Self-Medication Among Medical Students During Exam Time,” J. Chitwan Med. Coll., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 65–73, 2020, doi: 10.54530/jcmc.200.
I. Anwar and I. Saleem, “Exploring entrepreneurial characteristics among university students: an evidence from India,” Asia Pacific J. Innov. Entrep., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 282–295, 2019, doi: 10.1108/apjie-07-2018-0044.
M. M. Ayalew and S. A. Zeleke, “Modeling the impact of entrepreneurial attitude on self-employment intention among engineering students in Ethiopia,” J. Innov. Entrep., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s13731-018-0088-1.
R. Ramlan and S. Ngah, “Teaching Entrepreneurship at Universiti Kuala Lumpur- British Malaysian Institute: The Students’ Perceptionand Mindset,” Int. J. Futur. Comput. Commun., vol. 7, pp. 242–244, 2012, doi: 10.7763/ijfcc.2012.v1.64.
A. Arrighetti, L. Caricati, F. Landini, and N. Monacelli, “Entrepreneurial intention in the time of crisis: a field study,” Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 835–859, 2016, doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-12-2015-0326.
Cohen, Research Methods in Psychology Research Methods in Psychology, vol. 63, no. 1. BCCampus, 2011.
H. White and S. Sabarwal, “Quasi-experimental design and methods,” Methodol. briefs impact Eval., vol. 8, no. 2014, pp. 1–16, 2014.
J. W. Creswell, A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications, 2021.
J. W. Creswell, Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.
S. Schumacher and J. H. McMillan, Research in Education Evidence–Based Inquiry. Boston: Pearson Education, 2006.
P. Pandey and M. M. Pandey, Research methodology tools and techniques. Bridge Center, 2021.
R. B. Johnson and L. Christensen, Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated, 2019.
D. B. Audretsch, Entrepreneurship: A survey of the literature, vol. 14. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg, 2003.
S. A. Shane, The illusions of entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. Yale University Press, 2010.
E. Rasmussen and O. J. Borch, “University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities,” Res. Policy, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 602–612, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.002.
R. K. Mitchell, L. Busenitz, T. Lant, P. P. McDougall, E. A. Morse, and J. B. Smith, “Toward a Theory of Entrepreneurial Cognition: Rethinking the People Side of Entrepreneurship Research,” Entrep. Theory Pract., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 93–104, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1540-8520.00001.
A. L. Velasco, “Entrepreneurship education in the Philippines,” DLSU Bus. Econ. Rev., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2013.
A. Fayolle and B. Gailly, “From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education,” J. Eur. Ind. Train., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 569–593, 2008, doi: 10.1108/03090590810899838.
G. T. Solomon, S. Duffy, and A. Tarabishy, “The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A nationwide survey and analysis,” Int. J. Entrep. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65–86, 2002, [Online]. Available: http://www.mendeley.com/research/state-entrepreneurship-education-united-states-nationwide-survey-analysis/.
N. F. Krueger, Jr. and D. V. Brazeal, “Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs,” REGEPE - Rev. Empreendedorismo e Gestão Pequenas Empres., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 201–226, 2018, doi: 10.14211/regepe.v7i2.1071.
E. Rasmussen, S. Mosey, and M. Wright, “The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures,” Res. Policy, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 92–106, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.007.
T. A. Finkle, “Trends in the market for entrepreneurship faculty from 1989-2011,” J. Entrep. Educ., vol. 16, no. SPEC. ISSUE, pp. 59–76, 2013.
M. Guerrero and D. Urbano, “The development of an entrepreneurial university,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 43–74, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x.
E. Rasmussen, S. Mosey, and M. Wright, “The Evolution of Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Longitudinal Study of University Spin-Off Venture Emergence,” J. Manag. Stud., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1314–1345, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00995.x.
M. P. Bhave, “A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 223–242, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0883-9026(94)90031-0.
M. S. Cardon, C. Zietsma, P. Saparito, B. P. Matherne, and C. Davis, “A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–45, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.002.
A. Fayolle, “Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education,” in A research agenda for entrepreneurship education, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 127–138.
F. Liñán and A. Fayolle, “A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 907–933, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5.
W. Stam, S. Arzlanian, and T. Elfring, “Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 152–173, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.002.
H. E. Aldrich and J. E. Cliff, “The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 573–596, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9.
S. Shane, Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004.
J. West and M. Bogers, “Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation,” J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 814–831, 2014, doi: 10.1111/jpim.12125.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published article belongs to the authors and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY SA) International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See the Effect of Open Access).