Author Guidelines
Manuscript Preparation
- Manuscripts are sent in the Microsoft Word format (.doc or .docx).
- Articles submitted have never been published or are in the publication process elsewhere. In addition to the manuscript, the author's statement indicates that the text is genuine and does not contain elements of plagiarism.
- The articles received for publication are research and review articles.
- Articles sent are written in English with the structure and composition of academic writing standards. The manuscript was typed in one space with a letter size of 10 points and a quarto paper size (A4).
Articles sent to the International Journal of Environment, Engineering & Education must follow the guidelines for presenting the articles shown below:
TITLE. The title must be short, reliable and exciting to read. From the title, someone will be interested in reading the article's contents. Avoid using abbreviations. The title of the manuscript should be more than 150 characters (no spaces).
AUTHORS & AFFILIATIONS. The author's name must consist of a first name, middle name, and family name for all authors. Affiliate details must include department, University or organization, city, and country for all authors. One of the authors must be appointed as the author according to the asterisk (*) of his name. Only the author's e-mail address is appropriate, which must be provided in the article. The author is responsible for ensuring that the author's list and a summary of the author's contributions to this study are accurate and complete.
ABSTRACT & KEYWORDS. An abstract reader is needed to help understand the paper/article, look for information, and determine whether it is required. The abstract is a 'window' for the reader. The abstract contains an introduction/background, aims/hypothesis, method, results, and conclusions. Highly recommended not to use quotes and to avoid abbreviations if possible. The abstract length is 200 - 250 words. Keywords are in alphabetical order and do not exceed ten short words or phrases, not including the words used in the title. Keywords are carefully chosen to reflect the contents of the text accurately. The keyword length is between 4 - 6 words.
INTRODUCTION. The introduction provides essential background information that serves as a foundation, helping readers understand the context and relevance of the research. This section outlines the primary motivations and objectives of the study, giving readers a clear view of the issues or questions being addressed. It is a comprehensive summary that offers a concise overview of the article's content, setting the stage for the following detailed discussion.
LITERATURE REVIEW (optional/if needed). The literature review in a scientific study is a vital component that helps to establish the context and importance of the current research. It informs the reader of existing studies closely related to the topic, summarizing key findings and methodologies. By linking the new research to the existing body of knowledge, the literature review demonstrates how it builds on or deviates from previous work. Additionally, it identifies gaps or unresolved questions in prior research, justifying the need for the current investigation. Overall, the literature review synthesizes existing knowledge, positions the study within the academic landscape, and highlights its potential contribution to advancing the field.
MATERIAL AND METHODS. This section outlines the methodologies employed in the study to ensure reproducibility and rigor. It provides a detailed description of sampling procedures, sample preparation, and control sample preparation, specifying techniques and protocols used to maintain data integrity. Detailed information is given on measurement techniques, including the instruments and chemicals used, along with their suppliers to allow for precise replication. The section also describes the experimental setup and includes a map or specific details of the sampling sites or study area to contextualize the research. Information regarding the origin and handling of samples is presented to clarify sourcing and treatment processes. Where applicable, a statement confirming that ethical clearance was obtained is included to ensure compliance with ethical standards in research.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION. The Results section presents the findings derived from the study's data analysis, directly addressing the research questions. It provides a clear, objective presentation of the data, often using tables, figures, and charts to illustrate key results. In the Discussion section, the findings are interpreted and analyzed in relation to the research objectives. This section explores the implications of the results, explaining their significance and how they contribute to the field. The discussion connects the study's outcomes to existing literature, highlighting similarities, differences, or novel insights that the survey provides. It offers an in-depth analysis of the results, proposing explanations and considering any limitations while discussing their broader implications for theory, practice, or future research.
TABLES should be presented in a standard table format and not saved as images to maintain legibility and accessibility. The title of each table should be placed above the table and labeled sequentially (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3). Use a 9-point font size for the table title and all content within the table to ensure consistency and ease of reading.
FIGURES AND MAPS should be of high quality, with a resolution of 200-300 dpi to guarantee clear and detailed visuals. Accepted formats include .jpeg and .png, or you may embed images within a text box if necessary. The title for each image or map should be positioned below it, numbered in sequential order (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3).
FIGURES AND MAPS should be of high quality, with a resolution of 200-300 dpi to guarantee clear and detailed visuals. Accepted formats include .jpeg and .png, or you may embed images within a text box if necessary. The title for each image or map should be positioned below it, numbered in sequential order (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3).
CONCLUSIONS. The Conclusions section should be based on the findings and insights derived from the research, supported by the facts and data obtained throughout the study. This section must go beyond merely summarizing the research or reiterating the study's objectives. Instead, it should present clear and concise statements about the significance of the findings, highlighting their implications and how they contribute to the broader understanding of the topic. The conclusions should also offer recommendations for future research, practical applications, or policy implications, as appropriate, based on the results and conclusions drawn from the study.
Acknowledgment. This section is dedicated to recognizing individuals, organizations, agencies, or institutions that have contributed to the research process through their support, whether through ideas, funding, or other forms of assistance. The acknowledgment may include funding sources, advisors, colleagues, or institutions facilitating the research. It is important to ensure that anyone mentioned in this section consents to be named. Acknowledging contributions helps highlight the collaborative nature of research and provides credit to those who have supported the study.
REFERENCES. The reference list format is based on the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) style with DOI. The reference list should appear at the end of the article and include only literature cited in the manuscripts. We strongly recommend that authors use a reference management tool (Mendeley), and prioritize citing articles from journals with impact factors. Herewith are some of the references format structure:
- Journal: M. Jassim and G. Coskuner, “Environmental Engineering Education (E3) in the Gulf Co-operation Countries,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 93–103, 2007, doi: 10.1080/03043790601055683.
- Book: J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.
- Conference: S. Ghaffari and N. Talebbeydokhti, “Status of Environmental Engineering Education in Various Countries in Comparison with the Situation in Iran,” in 6th International Forum on Engineering Education (IFEE 2012), 2013, vol. 102, pp. 591–600.
CITATION MANIPULATION
Citation manipulation involves questionable practices that aim to boost citation counts without honesty for someone's or a group's benefit. This can happen when someone cites themselves too much, overly favors articles from a particular journal, or participates in agreements with other journals to inflate their bibliometric numbers. Recognizing the difference between these manipulative behaviors and legitimate citations is crucial. After all, using self-citation responsibly is perfectly fine when it genuinely supports the scholarly content of a manuscript.
Author Self-Citation: Authors may cite their work when necessary to provide background, ensure research continuity, or avoid redundancy, provided it contributes meaningfully to the academic discussion.
Citing Articles from the Same Journal: Citing articles from the same journal is acceptable if relevant, but journal editors should not encourage it as a requirement.
Self-Citation Limit: Authors are encouraged to limit self-citations to no more than 10% of the total references in an article. Each citation must be relevant and justified.
Action Against Manipulation: Serious or repeated violations may lead to corrective actions, including corrections, retractions, or publication withdrawal, by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines.
**If you require any further information, feel free to contact me (editor.ijeedu@gmail.com)
