Ethno-Pedagogical Module: A Theoretical Exploration of Knowledge Transmission in Ethnobiological Systems

Authors

  • Besnik Rexhepi Department of Biology, University of Tetova, Str. Ilinden, Tetovo 1220, North Macedonia
  • Ani Bajrami Museum of Natural Sciences “Sabiha Kasimati”, University of Tirana, Sheshi Nene Tereza 4, Tirana 1010, Albania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v7i1.181

Keywords:

Adaptive Learning, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Learning Systems, Social Cognitive

Abstract

The vertical transmission of ethnobiological knowledge across generations is crucial in preserving biodiversity and sustaining biocultural diversity. However, the mechanisms underpinning this process remain insufficiently studied. This paper introduces the "ethno-pedagogical module" as a novel interdisciplinary framework for analyzing and enhancing the understanding of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) transmission. The module integrates perspectives from cultural anthropology, education theory, and ethnobiology. Cultural anthropology contributes insights into the role of rituals, oral traditions, and communal practices in knowledge dissemination. Education theory offers methodologies for understanding experiential and participatory learning processes essential to TEK. Ethnobiology provides the foundation for examining the practical and symbolic human-environment relationships embedded in traditional practices. This framework facilitates the disaggregation of TEK systems and enables cross-cultural comparisons, revealing how diverse communities sustain biocultural diversity through unique adaptive practices and learning processes. It also offers practical applications by guiding the integration of TEK into formal and informal education systems to foster environmental stewardship and cultural resilience among younger generations. By addressing the complexities of TEK transmission, the ethno-pedagogical module presents a structured approach for preserving traditional knowledge amidst global environmental and cultural changes. The module bridges traditional ecological practices with contemporary educational strategies, promoting resilience and innovation in sustaining biocultural diversity. This interdisciplinary approach underscores the importance of collaboration in safeguarding cultural heritage and biodiversity in an increasingly interconnected and rapidly changing world.

References

[1] E. N. Anderson, “Ethnobiology and the new environmental anthropology,” in Routledge Handbook of Environmental Anthropology, Routledge, 2016, pp. 31–43.

[2] J. M. Nolan and N. J. Turner, “Ethnobotany: the study of people-plant relationships,” Ethnobiology, vol. 9, pp. 133–147, 2011.

[3] I. Svanberg and Ł. Łuczaj, Pioneers in European ethnobiology. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2014.

[4] H. Barnard, “Bourdieu and Ethnography: Reflexivity, Politics and Praxis,” An Introd. to Work Pierre Bourdieu, pp. 58–85, 1990, doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-21134-0_3.

[5] A. Angelsen, “Agricultural expansion and deforestation: Modelling the impact of population, market forces and property rights,” J. Dev. Econ., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 185–218, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00108-4.

[6] M. A. S. A. Khan, F. Sultana, M. H. Rahman, B. Roy, and S. I. Anik, “Status and ethno-medicinal usage of invasive plants in traditional health care practices: A case study from northeastern Bangladesh,” J. For. Res., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 649–658, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11676-011-0174-8.

[7] V. V. Wagh and A. K. Jain, “Status of ethnobotanical invasive plants in western Madhya Pradesh, India,” South African J. Bot., vol. 114, pp. 171–180, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2017.11.008.

[8] J. A. Hurrell, P. C. Stampella, M. B. Doumecq, and M. L. Pochettino, “Ethnoecology in Pluricultural Contexts: Theoretical and Methodological Contributions,” Methods Tech. Ethnobiol. Ethnoecology, pp. 163–186, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8919-5_12.

[9] M. R. González-Tejero et al., “Medicinal plants in the Mediterranean area: Synthesis of the results of the project Rubia,” J. Ethnopharmacol., vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 341–357, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.11.045.

[10] F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, “Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as adaptive management,” Ecol. Appl., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1251–1262, 2000, doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2.

[11] G. Mattalia, R. Sõukand, P. Corvo, and A. Pieroni, “‘We Became Rich and We Lost Everything’: Ethnobotany of Remote Mountain Villages of Abruzzo and Molise, Central Italy,” Hum. Ecol., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 217–224, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10745-020-00209-6.

[12] T. L. Gragson and B. G. Blount, Ethnoecology: knowledge, resources, and rights. University of Georgia Press, 1999.

[13] P. M. Guarrera, G. Forti, and S. Marignoli, “Ethnobotanical and ethnomedicinal uses of plants in the district of Acquapendente (Latium, Central Italy),” J. Ethnopharmacol., vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 429–444, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.09.014.

[14] A. M. Abbasi, M. H. Shah, and M. A. Khan, “Ethnobotany and Ethnomedicine,” Wild Edible Veg. Lesser Himalayas, pp. 19–29, 2015, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09543-1_2.

[15] R. Hames, “The ecologically noble savage debate,” Annu. Rev. Anthropol., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 177–190, 2007, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123321.

[16] R. R. N. Alves, A. K. Nishida, and M. I. M. Hernández, “Environmental perception of gatherers of the crab ‘caranguejo-uçá’ (Ucides cordatus, Decapoda, Brachyura) affecting their collection attitudes,” J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed., vol. 1, pp. 1–8, 2005, doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-1-10.

[17] J. Zhang and M. Cao, “Tropical forest vegetation of Xishuangbanna, SW China and its secondary changes, with special reference to some problems in local nature conservation,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 229–238, 1995, doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00118-A.

[18] C. L. Long and Y. Zhou, “Indigenous community forest management of Jinuo people’s swidden agroecosystems in southwest China,” Biodivers. Conserv., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 753–767, 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1016671003027.

[19] N. Barrera-Bassols and V. M. Toledo, “Ethnoecology of the Yucatec Maya: Symbolism, knowledge and management of natural resources,” J. Lat. Am. Geogr., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–41, 2005, doi: 10.1353/lag.2005.0021.

[20] S. L. Fedick and B. A. Morrison, “Ancient use and manipulation of landscape in the Yalahau region of the northern Maya lowlands,” Agric. Human Values, vol. 21, no. 2–3, pp. 207–219, 2004, doi: 10.1023/B:AHUM.0000029401.39131.ad.

[21] B. B. Faust, “Maya environmental successes and failures in the Yucatan Peninsula,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 4, no. 4–5, pp. 153–169, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00026-0.

[22] A. F. Roberts and B. Morris, The Power of Animals, An Ethnography, vol. 42, no. 3. Routledge, 1999.

[23] R. R. N. Alves, W. M. S. Souto, and U. P. Albuquerque, “Ethnozoology: Conceptual and Historical Aspects,” in Ethnozoology Animals in our Lives, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 9–24.

[24] R. R. N. Alves, J. S. Silva, L. da Silva Chave, and U. P. Albuquerque, “Ethnozoology: An Overview and Current Perspectives,” Ethnozoology Anim. our Lives, pp. 513–521, 2018, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809913-1.00027-2.

[25] R. R. N. Alves and W. M. S. Souto, “Ethnozoology: a brief introduction,” Ethnobiol. Conserv., vol. 4, 2015.

[26] E. Hunn, “Ethnobiology in four phases,” J. Ethnobiol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2007, doi: 10.2993/0278-0771(2007)27[1:EIFP]2.0.CO;2.

[27] L. Maffi, “Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity,” Annu. Rev. Anthr., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 599–617, 2005.

[28] J. Ayala, P. Bautista, M. Pajaro, M. Raquino, and P. Watts, “Sustainable development of Philippine coastal resources: Subsidiarity in ethnoecology through inclusive participatory education,” Int. Rev. Educ., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 161–185, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11159-016-9546-9.

[29] L. L. Cavalli-Sforza and M. W. Feldman, Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach., vol. 16, no. 16. Princeton University Press, 1981.

[30] E. Lev, “Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy): Medieval to present-day Levantine practice,” J. Ethnopharmacol., vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 107–118, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00377-X.

[31] E. Lev, “Reconstructed materia medica of the Medieval and Ottoman al-Sham,” J. Ethnopharmacol., vol. 80, no. 2–3, pp. 167–179, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00029-6.

[32] B. Mustafa, A. Hajdari, Q. Pajazita, B. Syla, C. L. Quave, and A. Pieroni, “An ethnobotanical survey of the Gollak region, Kosovo,” Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 739–754, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10722-011-9715-4.

[33] S. Ivancheva and B. Stantcheva, “Ethnobotanical inventory of medicinal plants in Bulgaria,” J. Ethnopharmacol., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0378-8741(99)00129-4.

[34] U. Pascual, “Land use intensification potential in slash-and-burn farming through improvements in technical efficiency,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 497–511, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.09.012.

[35] J. Smith, P. Van De Kop, K. Reategui, I. Lombardi, C. Sabogal, and A. Diaz, “Dynamics of secondary forests in slash-and-burn farming: Interactions among land use types in the Peruvian Amazon,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., vol. 76, no. 2–3, pp. 85–98, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00075-4.

[36] J. F. Martin, E. D. Roy, S. A. W. Diemont, and B. G. Ferguson, “Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK): Ideas, inspiration, and designs for ecological engineering,” Ecol. Eng., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 839–849, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.04.001.

[37] A. G. Chiarello, “Effects of fragmentation of the Atlantic forest on mammal communities in south-eastern Brazil,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 71–82, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00130-X.

[38] L. Cullen, R. E. Bodmer, and C. Valladares Pádua, “Effects of hunting in habitat fragments of the Atlantic forests, Brazil,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00011-2.

[39] B. Berlin, Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies, vol. 185. Princeton University Press, 2014.

[40] H. de Boer and V. Lamxay, “Plants used during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum healthcare in lao PDR: A comparative study of the Brou, Saek and Kry ethnic groups,” J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed., vol. 5, p. 25, 2009, doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-5-25.

[41] R. W. Kimmerer, “Weaving traditional ecological knowledge into biological education: A call to action,” Bioscience, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 432–438, 2002, doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0432:WTEKIB]2.0.CO;2.

[42] D. Nettle, “Explaining Global Patterns of Language Diversity,” J. Anthropol. Archaeol., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 354–374, 1998, doi: 10.1006/jaar.1998.0328.

[43] J. L. Moore et al., “The distribution of cultural and biological diversity in Africa,” Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., vol. 269, no. 1501, pp. 1645–1653, 2002, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2075.

[44] E. F. Moran, E. S. Brondizio, J. M. Tucker, M. C. Da Silva-Forsberg, S. McCracken, and I. Falesi, “Effects of soil fertility and land-use on forest succession in amazônia,” For. Ecol. Manage., vol. 139, no. 1–3, pp. 93–108, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00337-0.

[45] R. Neumann, “Stories of Nature’s Hybridity in Europe: Implications for Forest Conservation in the Global South,” Soc. Lives For. Past, Present. Futur. Woodl. Resurgence, pp. 33–44, 2000.

[46] R. Alexander, “Pedagogy, culture and the power of comparison,” in Educational Theories, Cultures and Learning: A Critical Perspective, Routledge, 2012, pp. 10–26.

[47] M. Bloch, J. Lave, and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation., vol. 29, no. 2. Cambridge university press, 1994.

[48] J. Lave and E. Wenger, “Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice,” in Distributed Learning: Social and Cultural Approaches to Practice, Routledge, 2013, pp. 56–63.

[49] K. M. Ramstad et al., “Species and cultural conservation in New Zealand: Maori traditional ecological knowledge of tuatara,” Conserv. Biol., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 455–464, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00620.x.

[50] R. J. M. Fuller, “Ethnobotany: Major developments of a discipline abroad, reflected in New Zealand,” New Zeal. J. Bot., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 116–138, 2013, doi: 10.1080/0028825X.2013.778298.

[51] S. Nugent, “Anthropology and public culture: The Yanomami, science and ethics,” Anthropol. Today, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 10–14, 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-8322.00059.

[52] L. Hogg, “Funds of Knowledge: An investigation of coherence within the literature,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 666–677, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.005.

[53] N. González, L. C. Moll, and C. Amanti, Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Routledge, 2006.

[54] L. C. Moll, “Elaborating Funds of Knowledge: Community-Oriented Practices in International Contexts,” Lit. Res. Theory, Method, Pract., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 130–138, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2381336919870805.

[55] B. M. K. J. Brayboy and E. Maughan, “Indigenous knowledges and the story of the bean,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2009, doi: 10.17763/haer.79.1.l0u6435086352229.

[56] A. J. Marsella, “Culture and conflict: Understanding, negotiating, and reconciling conflicting constructions of reality,” Int. J. Intercult. Relations, vol. 29, no. 6 SPEC. ISS., pp. 651–673, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.012.

[57] H. Lotz-Sisitka et al., “Co-designing research on transgressive learning in times of climate change,” Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., vol. 20, pp. 50–55, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.04.004.

[58] A. Wray and G. W. Grace, “The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form,” Lingua, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 543–578, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.005.

[59] J. Loh and D. Harmon, “A global index of biocultural diversity,” Ecol. Indic., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 231–241, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.02.005.

[60] F. Berkes, Sacred ecology. Routledge, 2017.

[61] M. Battiste, “The decolonization of Aboriginal education: Dialogue, reflection, and action in Canada,” Educ. Theor. Pract. from Major. world, pp. 168–195, 2008.

[62] L. E. Sponsel, “Spiritual ecology, sacred places, and biodiversity conservation,” in Routledge Handbook of Environmental Anthropology, Routledge, 2016, pp. 132–143.

[63] T. H. J. Marchand, Making Knowledge: Explorations of the Indissoluble Relation Between Mind, Body and Environment. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

[64] S. Zent, “Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and biocultural diversity: a close-up look at linkages, delearning trends & changing patterns of transmission,” Safeguarding Transm. Indig. Knowl., pp. 103–121, 2009.

[65] J. Parr, The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling, and Skill (review), vol. 43, no. 2. routledge, 2002.

[66] C. R. Menzies, Traditional ecological knowledge and natural resource management. U of Nebraska Press, 2006.

[67] E. Woodley, “Indigenous ecological knowledge systems and development,” Agric. Human Values, vol. 8, no. 1–2, pp. 173–178, 1991, doi: 10.1007/BF01579672.

[68] S. Sterling and D. Orr, Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change, vol. 6. Green Books for the Schumacher Society Totnes, 2001.

[69] J. Huckle, “Education for Sustainability: Assessing Pathways to the Future,” Aust. J. Environ. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 43–62, 1991, doi: 10.1017/S0814062600001853.

[70] S. Pearson, S. Honeywood, and M. O’Toole, “Not yet learning for sustainability: The challenge of environmental education in a university,” Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 173–186, 2005, doi: 10.1080/10382040508668349.

[71] D. A. Gruenewald and G. A. Smith, “Afterword: Creating a Movement to Ground Learning in Place,” Place-Based Educ. Glob. Age Local Divers., pp. 345–358, 2014.

[72] P. Theobald and J. Siskar, “Place: Where Diversity and Community Can Converge,” in Place-Based Education in the Global Age: Local Diversity, Routledge, 2014, pp. 197–220.

[73] J. Nespor, “Education and place: a review essay,” Educ. Theory, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 475–489, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00301.x.

[74] C. M. Raymond, I. Fazey, M. S. Reed, L. C. Stringer, G. M. Robinson, and A. C. Evely, “Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1766–1777, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023.

[75] I. Fazey et al., “Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 204–220, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012.

[76] B. Newell et al., “A conceptual template for integrative human-environment research,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 299–307, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.06.003.

[77] A. Bandura, “Social learning theory,” Englewood Cliffs, 1977.

[78] A. Bandura, “Analysis of modeling processes,” in Psychological Modeling: Conflicting Theories, Routledge, 2017, pp. 1–62.

[79] B. Rogoff, The cultural nature of human development. Oxford university press, 2003.

[80] E. Wenger, “Learning As A Social System,” Communities Pract., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 2–3, 1998.

[81] A. Bandura, “Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2001, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.

[82] U. Neisser, Cognitive psychology: Classic edition. Psychology press, 2014.

[83] N. Ross and C. Revilla-Minaya, “Cognitive Studies in Ethnobiology: What Can We Learn About the Mind as Well as Human Environmental Interaction?,” Ethnobiology, pp. 335–349, 2011, doi: 10.1002/9781118015872.ch20.

[84] B. Berlin, “Ethnobiological Classification,” in Cognition and Categorization, Routledge, 2024, pp. 9–26.

[85] S. Zent, “A genealogy of scientific representations of indigenous knowledge,” Landscape, Process Power Re-evaluating Tradit. Environ. Knowl., vol. 10, pp. 19–67, 2009.

[86] J. J. Gibson, “The Theory of Affordances: (1979),” in The people, place, and space reader, Routledge, 2014, pp. 56–60.

[87] D. Sobel, “Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities,” Educ. Mean. Soc. justice, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 63–64, 2004.

[88] S. Semken, E. G. Ward, S. Moosavi, and P. W. U. Chinn, “Place-based education in geoscience: Theory, research, practice, and assessment,” J. Geosci. Educ., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 542–562, 2017.

[89] R. Schuster, R. R. Germain, J. R. Bennett, N. J. Reo, and P. Arcese, “Vertebrate biodiversity on indigenous-managed lands in Australia, Brazil, and Canada equals that in protected areas,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 101, pp. 1–6, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.002.

[90] S. T. Garnett et al., “A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation,” Nat. Sustain., vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 369–374, 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6.

[91] M. Gadgil, F. Berkes, and C. Folke, “Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation,” Ambio, vol. 22, no. 2–3, pp. 151–156, 1993.

[92] M. L. Conner, “Informal learning,” marciaconner.com, 2013. http://marciaconner.com/resources/informal-learning/ (accessed Oct. 24, 2024).

[93] E. N. Anderson, “Ethnobiology: Overview of a Growing Field,” Ethnobiology, pp. 1–14, 2011, doi: 10.1002/9781118015872.ch1.

[94] R. Ellen and B. Berlin, Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies., vol. 29, no. 1. Princeton University Press, 1994.

[95] B. B. Little, R. M. Malina, and M. E. P. Reyes, “Natural selection and demographic transition in a Zapotec-speaking genetic isolate in the Valley of Oaxaca, southern Mexico,” Ann. Hum. Biol., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 34–49, 2008, doi: 10.1080/03014460701769808.

[96] E. S. Hunn, A Zapotec Natural History: Trees, Herbs, and Flowers, Birds, Beasts, and Bugs in the Life of San Juan Gb ‘‘. University of Arizona Press, 2008.

[97] I. Tudor, “Learning to live with complexity: Towards an ecological perspective on language teaching,” System, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00070-2.

[98] R. Blust and C. H. Brown, Language and Living Things: Uniformities in Folk Classification and Naming, vol. 61, no. 4. Rutgers University Press, 1985.

[99] A. V. Kravchenko, “Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code,” Lang. Sci., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 650–671, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.004.

[100] G. J. Martin, “Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology,” Encycl. Biodivers. Second Ed., pp. 319–328, 2001, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00046-0.

[101] G. T. Prance, “What is ethnobotany today?,” J. Ethnopharmacol., vol. 32, no. 1–3, pp. 209–216, 1991, doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(91)90120-3.

[102] J. Cruikshank, Do glaciers listen?: Local knowledge, colonial encounters, and social imagination. UBC Press, 2007.

[103] L. Hiwasaki, E. Luna, Syamsidik, and R. Shaw, “Process for integrating local and indigenous knowledge with science for hydro-meteorological disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in coastal and small island communities,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 10, pp. 15–27, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.07.007.

[104] F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge university press, 2008.

[105] B. K. Williams and E. D. Brown, “Technical challenges in the application of adaptive management,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 195, pp. 255–263, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.01.012.

[106] I. Davidson-Hunt and F. Berkes, “Learning as you journey: Anishinaabe perception of social-ecological environments and adaptive learning,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 8, no. 1, 2003, doi: 10.5751/es-00587-080105.

[107] I. Fazey, N. Pettorelli, J. Kenter, D. Wagatora, and D. Schuett, “Maladaptive trajectories of change in Makira, Solomon Islands,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1275–1289, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.006.

[108] J. T. Johnson, R. Howitt, G. Cajete, F. Berkes, R. P. Louis, and A. Kliskey, “Weaving Indigenous and sustainability sciences to diversify our methods,” Sustain. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11625-015-0349-x.

[109] M. A. Altieri, “Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture,” Front. Ecol. Environ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2004, doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0035:LEATFI]2.0.CO;2.

[110] M. A. Altieri, F. R. Funes-Monzote, and P. Petersen, “Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: Contributions to food sovereignty,” Agron. Sustain. Dev., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s13593-011-0065-6.

[111] C. A. Edwards, T. L. Grove, R. R. Harwood, and C. J. Pierce Colfer, “The role of agroecology and integrated farming systems in agricultural sustainability,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., vol. 46, no. 1–4, pp. 99–121, 1993, doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(93)90017-J.

[112] D. Yibarbuk et al., “Fire ecology and Aboriginal land management in central Arnhem Land, northern australia: A tradition of ecosystem management,” J. Biogeogr., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 325–343, 2001, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00555.x.

[113] B. Zimmerman, S. Schwartzman, A. Jerozolimski, J. Esllei, E. Santini, and S. Hugh, “Large Scale Forest Conservation With an Indigenous People in the Highly Threatened Southeastern Amazon of Brazil: The Kayapo,” Encycl. World’s Biomes Vol. 1-5, vol. 1–5, pp. V3-27-V3-34, 2020, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11918-9.

[114] V. Valeri and P. V. Kirch, The Wet and the Dry: Irrigation and Agricultural Intensification in Polynesia., vol. 101, no. 5. University of Chicago Press, 1996.

[115] S. Billett, “Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorising,” Learn. Instr., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 263–280, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(96)00006-0.

[116] P. G. R. Coals, V. L. Williams, G. Benítez, F. Chassagne, and M. Leonti, “Ethnopharmacology, Ethnomedicine, and Wildlife Conservation,” J. Ethnopharmacol., p. 118399, 2024.

[117] J. P. R. Thorn et al., “Indigenous uses of wild and tended plant biodiversity maintain ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes of the Terai Plains of Nepal,” J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s13002-020-00382-4.

[118] R. E. Johannes, “Did indigenous conservation ethics exist?,” SPC Tradit. Marit. Resour. Manag. Knowl. Inf. Bull., vol. 14, no. 1986, pp. 3–7, 2002.

[119] J. G. Robinson, “Ethical pluralism, pragmatism, and sustainability in conservation practice,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 958–965, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.017.

[120] J. Davies, “Mountain Biodiversity, Land Use Dynamics, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 107–109, 2001, doi: 10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00141-4.

[121] J. Blake, “UNESCO’s 2003 convention on intangible cultural heritage: The implications of community involvement in ‘safeguarding,’” in Intangible Heritage, Routledge, 2008, pp. 45–73.

[122] P. Grenand and F. Grenand, La côte d’Amapa, de la bouche de l’Amazone à la baie d’Oyapock, à travers la tradition orale Palikur, vol. 3, no. 1. Museu paraense Emilio Goeldi, 1987.

[123] UNESCO, Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger, vol. 81. Unesco, 2010.

[124] K. Fitzpatrick and S. May, Critical Ethnography and Education: Theory, Methodology, and Ethics. Routledge, 2022.

[125] D. L. Jorgensen, Principles, Approaches and Issues in Participant Observation. Routledge, 2020.

[126] S. Beller, A. Bender, and D. L. Medin, “Should anthropology be part of cognitive science?,” Top. Cogn. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 342–353, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01196.x.

[127] A. Bender and S. Beller, “The mutual challenge of anthropology and cognitive science,” Soc. Anthropol., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 199–200, 2015, doi: 10.1111/1469-8676.12116.

[128] H. R. Bernard, Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.

[129] B. Berlin, D. E. Breedlove, and P. H. Raven, “Folk taxonomies and biological classification,” Science (80-. )., vol. 154, no. 3746, pp. 273–275, 1966, doi: 10.1126/science.154.3746.273.

[130] M. Towle, The ethnobotany of pre-Columbian Peru. Routledge, 2017.

[131] S. T. Kwong See and E. B. Ryan, Intergenerational communication: The survey interview as a social exchange. Psychology Press Philadelphia, PA, 1999.

[132] H. Giles and J. Gasiorek, “Intergenerational Communication Practices,” in Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, Elsevier, 2011, pp. 233–247.

[133] V. Krivtsov, “Investigations of indirect relationships in ecology and environmental sciences: A review and the implications for comparative theoretical ecosystem analysis,” Ecol. Modell., vol. 174, no. 1–2, pp. 37–54, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.12.042.

[134] P. Jordano, “Sampling networks of ecological interactions,” Funct. Ecol., vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1883–1893, 2016, doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12763.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-07

How to Cite

[1]
B. Rexhepi and A. Bajrami, “Ethno-Pedagogical Module: A Theoretical Exploration of Knowledge Transmission in Ethnobiological Systems”, Int. J. Environ. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2025.

Issue

Section

Review Article