IJEEDU welcomes evidence-based discussion of articles after publication. Authors, readers, and researchers may submit a scholarly comment, methodological critique, replication finding, or response through the journal’s. Please provide the article title and DOI or URL, a concise account of the point being raised, relevant evidence or references, and the contributor’s name and affiliation. A request for confidential handling may be explained in the submission.

The editors assess whether a contribution is relevant, sufficiently supported, and suitable for scholarly discussion. They may request clarification or expert assessment and will normally invite the original authors to respond before publishing a substantive critique. Acceptance of a comment or response does not imply that the journal endorses every view expressed in it.

IJEEDU may publish a suitable contribution as a letter, commentary, or other clearly identified item, together with an author response where appropriate. Published discussion should be linked to the article under discussion whenever the journal’s publishing platform permits. Contributions must address the research and its interpretation in a professional manner. Unsupported accusations, personal attacks, confidential information disclosed without authorization, and abusive content will not be published.

A concern that calls into question the accuracy or integrity of the published record may also be assessed under IJEEDU’s Correction and Retraction Policy or Allegations of Research Misconduct Policy. Scholarly disagreement alone does not establish misconduct or justify retraction. Discussion may continue after an editorial notice is issued, subject to the same standards of evidence and conduct.